sheeno73 / procurement

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/procurement
0 stars 0 forks source link

{Stash:Name} doesn't work for remove-only tabs #445

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
1.) Did you first check the wiki for your issue?
2.) Did you check to see if there is already a ticket for your issue?

What version of Procurement are you using? On what operating system?
1.8.5, Windows 7

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Launch Procurement.
2. Go to Trading tab.
3. Use a forum template that makes use of {Stash:Name} tags. For instance, I 
have several premium tabs named "+", some that are normal tabs and some with 
Remove-only status. The output shows only the contents of the normal (i.e. 
non-Remove-only tabs) tabs.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I would expect to see the contents of both normal and Remove-only tabs that are 
named "+". The output shows only the contents of the normal (i.e. 
non-Remove-only tabs) tabs.

Please paste the contents of your DebugInfo.log file below if applicable.
To minimize the size of the file, delete your existing debuginfo.log file,
before replicating the issue.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by rem...@gmail.com on 21 Nov 2014 at 2:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Interesting, I'll look into this.

Original comment by stickymaddness on 23 Nov 2014 at 4:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
For the remove only tabs you'll need to add " (Remove-only)", so for your case 
where you have tabs named + your template would have:

{Stash:+}
{Stash:+ (Remove-only)}

Original comment by stickymaddness on 30 Nov 2014 at 10:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Thanks, this worked! Not sure why I didn't think of that.

For what it's worth, previous versions of Procurement (earlier than 1.8 maybe?) 
picked up remove-only tabs without adding the '(Remove-only)' to the stash tab 
name tag.

Original comment by rem...@gmail.com on 30 Nov 2014 at 10:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by stickymaddness on 12 Dec 2014 at 5:35