Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
The verbosity argument refers to the messages logged by the Gallio runtime,
rather
than the output of the console app, although I can appreciate the confusion. If
you
run it with /v:Debug you should see the difference. There isn't currently any
way to
suppress the progress messages, is that something you would be interested in?
Original comment by grahamr...@gmail.com
on 4 May 2009 at 4:02
Ahh I see now. May want to add something about the "log" in the verbiage. I'm
running echo through a shared c# routine that collects the output so I was just
trying to save some memory :)
Original comment by hecktarz...@gmail.com
on 4 May 2009 at 4:53
/verbosity:<level> Controls the level of detail of the information to display.
The
available options are: 'Quiet', 'Normal', 'Verbose', 'Debug'. (Short form: /v)
Yeah, currently this is very misleading as it says "Display" not "Log"
Original comment by hecktarz...@gmail.com
on 4 May 2009 at 5:03
The main difference I remember is that we have a log level called
Important. Progress messages are logged with Important which
iirc is now displayed in Quiet mode. That said you will still see the
progress bar (when using Echo interactively) but it won't leave a
trace in the summary.
There isn't much difference between logging and displaying as far
as echois concerned. Filtering happens just before display using
the verbosity to decide whether a message of given severity
should be shown. This is a pretty typical design for command line
tools.
Original comment by jeff.br...@gmail.com
on 4 May 2009 at 7:00
Doh, nevermind about the progress monitor. I forgot that the top line of the
progress message (the task name) just gets left behind by the progress
monitoring
apparatus itself rather than being printed by the log. Can't believe I wrote
that
code only a year ago. *sigh*
Thanks Graham for clearing that up.
In any case, I guess a good question is whether the rich console progress
monitor
should somehow respond to verbosity or whether we should add a /no-progress
option.
Original comment by jeff.br...@gmail.com
on 5 May 2009 at 6:48
Original comment by jeff.br...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2009 at 11:50
Fixed in v3.0.7
Original comment by jeff.br...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2009 at 12:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
hecktarz...@gmail.com
on 4 May 2009 at 2:30