In the Driller paper, there are 13 applications that invoked and benefited from concolic execution. The public name for application with identifier 2b03cf01 is given as NRFIN_00017 for the case study, but I'm wondering how to resolve the identifier to a public name for the other 12: 2bda8e01, 5d469c01, 576b9101, 5e453901, 77263701, 17422001, d113bd01, f8271b01, 16d55a01, 6787bf01, 76ddd501, f5adc401. They look like CRC32 hashes, but what was being hashed?
If you have the public name for each hash, that would be perfect. Even a binary sample might be sufficient so that I could run strings on it to find the public name.
I'd like to study more about these programs and how they would run on a native Linux environment with real libc functions. Any help would be appreciated! Thank you!
In the Driller paper, there are 13 applications that invoked and benefited from concolic execution. The public name for application with identifier
2b03cf01
is given asNRFIN_00017
for the case study, but I'm wondering how to resolve the identifier to a public name for the other 12:2bda8e01, 5d469c01, 576b9101, 5e453901, 77263701, 17422001, d113bd01, f8271b01, 16d55a01, 6787bf01, 76ddd501, f5adc401
. They look like CRC32 hashes, but what was being hashed?If you have the public name for each hash, that would be perfect. Even a binary sample might be sufficient so that I could run
strings
on it to find the public name.I'd like to study more about these programs and how they would run on a native Linux environment with real
libc
functions. Any help would be appreciated! Thank you!