Closed t-moennich closed 3 years ago
Merging #253 (dcd13f5) into master (9333cc1) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #253 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.19% 98.19%
=======================================
Files 3 3
Lines 111 111
=======================================
Hits 109 109
Misses 2 2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
lib/helpers.js | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9333cc1...dcd13f5. Read the comment docs.
Thanks for opening a PR. Looks like a good change to me. As the PR mentions, we don't accept fixes or features without accompanying tests. You'll likely have to update the test for generate
, and I'd like to see a test added for that new parameter specifically.
@t-moennich a quick ping. If there's no action on this PR for another 14 days I'll have to assume it's been abandoned.
Closing as abandoned
@shellscape I thought this was exactly what I was looking for but it was never merged. Is there a workaround for this issue.
I've been getting errors like this when using generate
to try to access deprecated methods such as file.chunk.getModules()
There was no ChunkGraph assigned to the Chunk for backward-compat (Use the new API)
Is there another way to access ChunkGraph
inside Generate
or to actually force the legacy ChunkGraph to be assigned to each file passed to generate
?
This PR contains:
Are tests included?
Breaking Changes?
If yes, then include "BREAKING CHANGES:" in the first commit message body, followed by a description of what is breaking.
List any relevant issue numbers:
Description
This PR adds access to the Compilation object in the
generate()
callback to allow working with the newChunkGraph
API