Closed mastilver closed 7 years ago
Merging #56 into master will decrease coverage by
0.93%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #56 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 100% 99.06% -0.94%
==========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 56 107 +51
==========================================
+ Hits 56 106 +50
- Misses 0 1 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
lib/plugin.js | 99.05% <100%> (-0.95%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c441207...29ffc01. Read the comment docs.
The main question here - does it really fix #21? I don't see an appropriate test case added here. If it is hard to reproduce maybe we should ask reporters of #21 to test this fix with their local setup?
If it doesn't fix #21 then I don't see why it should be merged. As a step for #33 as supposed here https://github.com/danethurber/webpack-manifest-plugin/issues/33#issuecomment-314063783 ? Don't think we need this step - we better fix #33 with one monolithic PR
@zuzusik Thank you for reviewing this PR :)
Did you see #49, I think you could be a good help for me
I think I know what's causing the issue, I will try to write a test that reproduce it
Also added few style related comments here
One serious concern here: https://github.com/danethurber/webpack-manifest-plugin/pull/56/files#r126405642
@zuzusik PR updated, do you mind having another look
@zuzusik I'm not relying anymore or memory-fs
logic
Let me know what you think!
closes #21