Closed philipskokoh closed 6 years ago
Looking back at the previous git versions of the code, you would find out that the author changed the formulation of the losses in the code several months after having published the article. In particular, it looks like the author opted for the non-saturating loss formulation as suggested in the paper "Generative Adversarial Networks" (Goodfellow et al. - 2014) .
Ah, yes. You are right @WolfLo . Thanks! Reference: 78380ae822d5f951a415acc7f89433d75169f0e1
Hi,
It seems that loss_adv and final loss are not the same as eq.8 and eq.9 in the paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.09655.pdf). https://github.com/shentianxiao/language-style-transfer/blob/f078a9d342705ea62b04dd3ac5926d3467c2ac63/code/style_transfer.py#L131 https://github.com/shentianxiao/language-style-transfer/blob/f078a9d342705ea62b04dd3ac5926d3467c2ac63/code/style_transfer.py#L132
Any additional tricks / optimizations in the implementation?