Closed sherlock-admin2 closed 1 year ago
3 comment(s) were left on this issue during the judging contest.
panprog commented:
low, because all account ETH balance is expected to be for liquidator payment only
tsvetanovv commented:
He has to deposit ETH because of
ante
. If he deposits more I think it is his mistake
MohammedRizwan commented:
valid
rvierdiiev
medium
Liquidator receives all eth balance of borrower instead of ante
Summary
Liquidator receives all eth balance of borrower instead of ante
Vulnerability Detail
When liquidation occurs, then in the end liquidator receives eth from borrower's balance. The amount depends on
strain
param and on borower's balance.There is a requirement for borrower. In case if he wants to do any operation using
modify
function, then after that operation he should have at leastante
on his eth balance. Thisante
is smth like deposit, that user should hold to be able to act. And as you have already seen it's used to pay liquidator.The problem is that borrower can have much more than
ante
on his balance as he can operate with eth. In that case liquidator will be able to grab whole that amount.Impact
Borrower can loose all eth balance.
Code Snippet
Provided above
Tool used
Manual Review
Recommendation
I believe that such payment should be fair for liquidators: