sherlock-audit / 2023-12-avail-judging

4 stars 4 forks source link

Anubis - Handling of Cryptographic Primitives (General Best Practice) #22

Closed sherlock-admin2 closed 9 months ago

sherlock-admin2 commented 9 months ago

Anubis

medium

Handling of Cryptographic Primitives (General Best Practice)

Summary

The contract implements cryptographic operations, specifically Merkle proof verification, which is sensitive and requires precise and secure implementation.

Vulnerability Detail

The Merkle.sol contract is responsible for verifying Merkle proofs, a cryptographic operation that must be performed accurately to ensure the integrity of the verification process. Any flaw or inefficiency in the implementation can lead to incorrect verification results, either falsely accepting invalid proofs or rejecting valid ones. This is critical, as Merkle proofs are often used to verify the inclusion of a transaction or a state in a block, and errors can lead to security breaches or denial of service.

Impact

Incorrect or insecure implementation of Merkle proof verification can compromise the integrity of the verification process, leading to potential security vulnerabilities where invalid states or transactions might be accepted as valid.

Code Snippet

https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-12-avail/blob/main/contracts/src/lib/Merkle.sol#L12-L41

Tool used

Manual Review

Recommendation

Ensure that the cryptographic operations, specifically Merkle proof verification, are implemented correctly and securely. Given the critical nature of these operations, external audits and formal verification (if possible) are highly recommended. Additionally, comprehensive testing with a wide range of test cases is crucial to ensure the accuracy and security of the verification process.

function verify(bytes32[] calldata proof, bytes32 root, uint256 index, bytes32 leaf)
    internal
    pure
    returns (bool isValid)
{
    assembly ("memory-safe") {
        // Initialization and setup for the proof verification
        let end := add(proof.offset, shl(5, proof.length))
        let i := proof.offset

        // Loop through the proof elements
        for {} 1 {} {
            // ... computation and verification logic ...

            // Break condition and result checking
            if iszero(lt(i, end)) { break }
        }

        // Final comparison to determine the validity of the proof
        isValid := and(eq(leaf, root), iszero(index))
    }
}
sherlock-admin commented 9 months ago

1 comment(s) were left on this issue during the judging contest.

takarez commented:

invalid because {invalid: best practice}