The sendETH function in the smart contract contains a potential integer overflow vulnerability when typecasting a uint256 value to a uint64. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to exploit the contract when the id becomes too large, resulting in unintended behavior or manipulation of the contract state.
Vulnerability Detail
The id variable is initially declared as uint256, which means it can potentially exceed the maximum value that a uint64 can hold. When an overflow occurs during this typecasting, it can lead to unexpected behavior and security risks.
Impact
If an attacker successfully triggers the integer overflow in the sendETH function, it can have several adverse consequences:
Data Corruption: An overflowed id may lead to data corruption within the contract or unintended data storage in the isSent mapping.
Manipulation: An attacker could potentially manipulate the contract's state or disrupt its normal operation.
Financial Loss: Depending on how the contract uses id, an overflow could result in financial losses for users or unintended transfers of funds.
Code Snippet
Here is the relevant code snippet from the sendETH function:
To address the integer overflow vulnerability in the sendETH function, consider the following recommendations:
Validate Inputs: Implement input validation to ensure that the id does not exceed the maximum value that can be represented by a uint64. This can be done by checking if the id is within the valid range before performing the typecast.
Safe Casting: Use a safe typecasting method, such as the SafeMath library, to ensure that typecasting from uint256 to uint64 does not result in an integer overflow.
Comprehensive Testing: Thoroughly test the contract with various scenarios to verify that the vulnerability has been effectively mitigated.
By implementing these recommendations, you can enhance the security and reliability of the smart contract, reducing the risk of potential exploits related to integer overflows.
0xC
high
Integer Overflow in
sendETH
FunctionSummary
The
sendETH
function in the smart contract contains a potential integer overflow vulnerability when typecasting auint256
value to auint64
. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to exploit the contract when the id becomes too large, resulting in unintended behavior or manipulation of the contract state.Vulnerability Detail
The
id
variable is initially declared asuint256
, which means it can potentially exceed the maximum value that auint64
can hold. When an overflow occurs during this typecasting, it can lead to unexpected behavior and security risks.Impact
If an attacker successfully triggers the integer overflow in the
sendETH
function, it can have several adverse consequences:Data Corruption: An overflowed
id
may lead to data corruption within the contract or unintended data storage in theisSent
mapping.Manipulation: An attacker could potentially manipulate the contract's state or disrupt its normal operation.
Financial Loss: Depending on how the contract uses
id
, an overflow could result in financial losses for users or unintended transfers of funds.Code Snippet
Here is the relevant code snippet from the
sendETH
function:https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-12-avail/blob/main/contracts/src/AvailBridge.sol#L368
Tool used
Manual Review
Recommendation
To address the integer overflow vulnerability in the
sendETH
function, consider the following recommendations:Validate Inputs: Implement input validation to ensure that the
id
does not exceed the maximum value that can be represented by auint64
. This can be done by checking if theid
is within the valid range before performing the typecast.Safe Casting: Use a safe typecasting method, such as the
SafeMath
library, to ensure that typecasting fromuint256
touint64
does not result in an integer overflow.Comprehensive Testing: Thoroughly test the contract with various scenarios to verify that the vulnerability has been effectively mitigated.
By implementing these recommendations, you can enhance the security and reliability of the smart contract, reducing the risk of potential exploits related to integer overflows.