sherlock-audit / 2023-12-ubiquity-judging

2 stars 2 forks source link

bareli - No access control #191

Closed sherlock-admin closed 10 months ago

sherlock-admin commented 10 months ago

bareli

medium

No access control

Summary

There is no onlyAdmin modifier in the updateChainLinkCollateralPrice and amoMinterBorrow.

Vulnerability Detail

function updateChainLinkCollateralPrice(uint256 collateralIndex) external { LibUbiquityPool.updateChainLinkCollateralPrice(collateralIndex); }

function amoMinterBorrow(uint256 collateralAmount) external { LibUbiquityPool.amoMinterBorrow(collateralAmount); }

Impact

Any one calls this function and update the function?

Code Snippet

https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-12-ubiquity/blob/main/ubiquity-dollar/packages/contracts/src/dollar/facets/UbiquityPoolFacet.sol#L123

Tool used

Manual Review

Recommendation

use onlyowner modifier.

sherlock-admin2 commented 10 months ago

1 comment(s) were left on this issue during the judging contest.

auditsea commented:

amoMinterBorrow is restriced in library level

sherlock-admin2 commented 10 months ago

1 comment(s) were left on this issue during the judging contest.

auditsea commented:

amoMinterBorrow is restriced in library level

nevillehuang commented 10 months ago

Invalid

  1. updateChainLinkCollateralPrice() - Does not require access control, simply updates price to update to date chainlink price, which will benefit all users
  2. amoMinterBorrow() - relevant acces control is already checked here, wherein the caller must be a enabled amo by the admin