Closed sherlock-admin3 closed 7 months ago
1 comment(s) were left on this issue during the judging contest.
takarez commented:
POC?
escalate hey may i know that why it got invalid ?
escalate hey may i know that why it got invalid ?
The escalation could not be created because you are not exceeding the escalation threshold.
You can view the required number of additional valid issues/judging contest payouts in your Profile page, in the Sherlock webapp.
@sherlock-admin3 why this issue got invalid ?
It's in the Sherlock docs:
Admin Input/call validation: Protocol admin is considered to be trusted in most cases, hence issues where
- Admin incorrectly enters an input parameter. Example: Make sure interestPerMin > 1 ether as it is an important parameter. This is not a valid issue.
Dudex_2004
medium
Precision Mismatch in
setLiquidationFeeRatio
andsetLiquidationBufferRatio
Functions.Summary
See details.
Vulnerability Detail
In the
LiquidationModule.sol
contract the liquidation fee and buffer ratios (functionsetLiquidationFeeRatio
andsetLiquidationBufferRatio
) are expected to have 18 decimals of precision. However ,the functions should ensure that the input values (_newLiquidationFeeRatio
and_newLiquidationBufferRatio
) are indeed given in this format.If the provided values do not match the expected precision (e.g., if a owner inputs a value such as 0.002 instead of 2e15), then the contract may be set to use incorrect or unintended ratios.
Impact
Values can be set incorrectly.
Code Snippet
https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-03-flat-money-fix-review-contest/blob/main/flatcoin-v1/src/LiquidationModule.sol#L31C1-L39C1 https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-03-flat-money-fix-review-contest/blob/main/flatcoin-v1/src/LiquidationModule.sol#L283C1-L298C1
Tool used
Manual Review
Recommendation
provide input values have the expected precision of 18 decimals.