Also, performance on full backups seems quite slow (compared to dynamodb-replicator). Have you looked into using streams?
Overall, I'm excited about using this library instead of 'dynamo-replicator' because of it's small size/scope and the included point-of-time restore feature. The lack of tests, however, make me hesitant about using it in production.
related to #22, would be great if config objects let us optionally append the tablename to the prefix. maybe like:
Also, performance on full backups seems quite slow (compared to dynamodb-replicator). Have you looked into using streams?
Overall, I'm excited about using this library instead of 'dynamo-replicator' because of it's small size/scope and the included point-of-time restore feature. The lack of tests, however, make me hesitant about using it in production.