In shex-simple, the first example in the manifest includes one positive test and one negative test (that is the latter is expected to fail). I expressed this as
(I couldn't just changed conformant to nonconformant because the first one is conformant and the second is not.
If I recall, @labra suggested reversing the order of the @ and the !, which I agree with because it keens shape expr references (@<ShapeURL>) consistent between ShapeMaps and ShEx.
In shex-simple, the first example in the manifest includes one positive test and one negative test (that is the latter is expected to fail). I expressed this as
(I couldn't just changed
conformant
tononconformant
because the first one is conformant and the second is not.If I recall, @labra suggested reversing the order of the
@
and the!
, which I agree with because it keens shape expr references (@<ShapeURL>
) consistent between ShapeMaps and ShEx.