Option to use `includet` instead of `include`

shg / ob-julia-vterm.el

Org-babel support for Julia code blocks using julia-vterm

GNU General Public License v3.0

36 stars 6 forks source link

Option to use `includet` instead of `include` #4

Open MasonProtter opened 3 years ago

MasonProtter commented 3 years ago

Currently, code gets entered with include which makes sense, but I just learned today about https://github.com/MichaelHatherly/InteractiveErrors.jl which makes me wish that the code was entered using Revise.includet so that I could interactively explore errors in the code more readily using the REPL.

Great package btw, I'm happy this exists, having to use IJulia and emacs-jupyter is a bit of a pain.

shg commented 3 years ago

Thank you for the suggestion. I didn't know InteractiveErrors.jl. It looks very useful. Let me check how it works.

shg commented 3 years ago

Could you elaborate on the actual workflow you want? How do you want to interact with source blocks and how should it be improved by using includet?