As you know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
You can easily set a standardized one through the GH's license wizard tool.
Let us know how we could improve - in your opinion - our categorizations and links to resources in order to favor collaboration between developers (and therefore evolution) of listed projects.
Last but not least, since our organization manages live music Youtube channel (older one here), we can provide you many hours of audio from our multiple cameras we've recorded at live events (we do have some classical stuff too) if you need.
MarcoRavich
commented
2 months ago
Hi there, 1st of all thanks for this awesome work !
Since we've 'doxed' it in our HyMPS project (under AUDIO section \ AI-based category \ Enhancers page \ Aligners), can you please add a GH-compliant license file for it ?
As you know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
You can easily set a standardized one through the GH's license wizard tool.
Let us know how we could improve - in your opinion - our categorizations and links to resources in order to favor collaboration between developers (and therefore evolution) of listed projects.
Last but not least, since our organization manages live music Youtube channel (older one here), we can provide you many hours of audio from our multiple cameras we've recorded at live events (we do have some classical stuff too) if you need.
Hope that helps/inspires !