Open rnagy opened 1 year ago
That'd probably induce much more overhead than current implementation that is based on shared memory.
Another missing piece is some kind of daemon sitting in a VM and spawning those worker processes (we use one worker per CDM instance) and that is, honestly, out of scope.
Hi
This is not really a bug, but rather a question about the possibility of running the worker on different system than the actual wrapper library and communicate over TCP/IP instead of sockets, which would allow any architecture and OS to use this code while running the worker on a "remote" linux vm or whatever.
Thanks