IDK how I missed this before during #96, but rustdoc gives a warning on the LICENSE link. The link does actually work! But I think rustdoc gets confused by "shorthand" link paths (LICENSE) because there could be a rust doc item by the same name.
rustdoc does not get confused by explicit URL paths tho, so this updates the LICENSE link to use the full URL
Coverage remained the same at 92.238% when pulling 113f95e1df4ee6553b36240bf24e631550835289 on license-link-lint into 8215f061433957712c5217917ab0aa3153d463f0 on main.
IDK how I missed this before during #96, but rustdoc gives a warning on the
LICENSE
link. The link does actually work! But I think rustdoc gets confused by "shorthand" link paths(LICENSE)
because there could be a rust doc item by the same name.rustdoc does not get confused by explicit URL paths tho, so this updates the LICENSE link to use the full URL