Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Hello,
We have a little bit more information to report, which may assist with locating
it;
Win32 build => pink line. (all 1s we presume)
OSX build => green line. (all 0s we presume)
Cheers
Martin
Original comment by martinli...@gmail.com
on 9 Nov 2010 at 2:30
I haven't been able to reproduce this. Can you try to reproduce this with
vpxdec? Which version are you running?
Original comment by jkoles...@google.com
on 9 Nov 2010 at 1:35
Hello,
I've been able to mask the problem successfully, by adding the following lines
to
vp8_yv12_extend_frame_borders_ptr(&oci->post_proc_buffer);
To the postproc.c file, vp8_post_proc_frame function,
"if (flags & VP8D_DEMACROBLOCK)" and
"else if (flags & VP8D_DEBLOCK)" blocks.
I have a strong suspicion that it has to do with the media we are using which
is 32 x 32 pixels (or multiples thereof).
The top of the CHANGELOG reads; 2010-10-28 v0.9.5 "Aylesbury"
Thanks
Martin
Original comment by martinli...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2010 at 2:05
Do you mean *NOT* a multiple of 32x32? Can you provide a sample clip (can be
just a few frames) or at a minimum, the exact resolution which is displaying
this problem?
Original comment by jkoles...@google.com
on 10 Nov 2010 at 1:47
Pretty much all the video we do is a multiple of 16 in both width and height.
The media in question is a multiple of 32. We've tried a HD 720p frame size
and a 32x32 pixel clip. Both exhibit the same problem. We build our own vpx
libs, but the one downloaded had the same issue.
Let me know how you want any frames packaged and I'll do that.
Thanks
Martin
Original comment by martinli...@gmail.com
on 11 Nov 2010 at 12:40
if you can send a .webm or .ivf file that shows the problem, that should be
enough to get me started. If this is an application that doesn't deal with
files, you can also give us a "raw" file by writing the data you pass to
vpx_codec_decode() to a file -- for each frame, write a 4 byte little endian
int with the length of that frame's data, followed by the data.
just to be clear, I'm looking for the compressed data, not the
decoded/postprocessed image. I'm want to reproduce with vpxdec.
Original comment by jkoles...@google.com
on 11 Nov 2010 at 1:29
Hi,
I've almost achieved what you asked for;
1 file per frame;
File Format:
[2 bytes] junk
[4 bytes] size (little endian)
[1 byte] junk
[VPx frame data]
I hope this helps.
Cheers
Martin
Original comment by martinli...@gmail.com
on 12 Nov 2010 at 3:50
Attachments:
Hello,
I was wondering if there was any further forwards motion on this issue.
Thanks
Martin
Original comment by martinli...@gmail.com
on 23 Nov 2010 at 6:43
I haven't been able to reproduce this on osx or linux. I converted the data you
sent me into something that vpxdec can process and have attached it to this
bug. Please confirm your can reproduce on your systems with this input file and
the vpxdec tool and then I'll give you some additional tests to try.
Original comment by jkoles...@google.com
on 23 Nov 2010 at 7:06
Attachments:
Hello,
I downloaded the windows code via this link;
http://code.google.com/p/webm/downloads/detail?name=vpx-vp8-debug-src-x86-win32m
t-vs8-v0.9.5.zip&can=2&q=
I built all the libraries and then grabbed vpxdec.exe
I ran it with the following arguments;
vpxdec.exe --i420 --postproc --deblock --demacroblock-level=16
--output=test_%2.raw postproc-bug.raw
The file it produced I imported into Irfanview, as a raw file, no header, 32x32
pixels, interpreted as at YUV 4:2:0 image. It produced no line.
Not satisfied with this, I tried another series of frames encoded from a movie
trailer. Same effect; however we noticed pink lines appearing at the sides of
the image (not solid, only shades).
Having a series of interleaved frames with the post processor on and post
processor off - we were examining the difference, and realised that the post
processor was not a post processor at all, but rather a post smudging filter
that removes detail. Upon realisation of this, and testing with demacroblock
set to 1 - we noticed that it didn't improve the video quality - like it has
done previously with the VP6 codec - it simply made it worse.
Our solution is as follows; Turn off the smudging filter, remove code kludges
and mark the problem as "not an issue" and leave it.
Thanks
Martin
Original comment by martinli...@gmail.com
on 24 Nov 2010 at 4:36
Original comment by jkoles...@google.com
on 1 Mar 2011 at 1:27
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
martinli...@gmail.com
on 5 Nov 2010 at 7:36