Dear author, thanks very much for your sharing of the code and the lists of training and testing light fields. However, in the training list, I found "bikes_10, bikes_4, bikes_5, bikes_6", while in the testing list, you said that the testing set contains the sub-set bikes 1-10. I think the training light fields and the testing light fields have some overlap, am I right? Or maybe Bikes is not the sub-dataset from Stanford light field archive?
Thank you for pointing out the problem! We wrongly put the older version of the training dataset. The related information is updated and please refer to Read Me for further details.
Dear author, thanks very much for your sharing of the code and the lists of training and testing light fields. However, in the training list, I found "bikes_10, bikes_4, bikes_5, bikes_6", while in the testing list, you said that the testing set contains the sub-set bikes 1-10. I think the training light fields and the testing light fields have some overlap, am I right? Or maybe Bikes is not the sub-dataset from Stanford light field archive?