Open rcross-lc opened 2 months ago
KAS_BUILD_DIR
is not really a project setting, it's a local decision. Or why should all users of your configs split the build dirs like you suggest?
But even if we wanted to introduce a configurable default value to the config, that would not work across kas-container
. It needs to know this value but has no parser for configs with all their includes and overrides (except for very simplistic top-level evaluations).
I think I understand the problem, I'll investigate why my scarthgap builds can't co-exist with my kirkstone builds and/or change the TMPDIR and cache directories maybe...
My use case here is that I have a kirkstone.yaml and a scarthgap.yaml and I would like them to have completely separate build directories.
Is there a way to set this up so that I don't need to manage environment variables via another wrapper script?
If not, can this setting be exposed to the yaml config?