search

siemens / meta-iot2000

SIMATIC IOT2000 Yocto Board Support Package
Other
127 stars 85 forks source link

Update to Yocto 3.1.1 LTS (Dunfell) #162

Closed BaochengSu closed 3 years ago

BaochengSu commented 3 years ago

Update to Yocto 3.1.1 LTS (Dunfell)

jan-kiszka commented 3 years ago

Additionally, we should check if there is more to update:

Then I wonder if all our bbappends are still relevant and could be dropped - or if we miss some updates. Example:

BaochengSu commented 3 years ago

Uff, looks like you had a lot of with nodefs and python3...

Yes, I will leave some comments on the commit messge to show how the work has been done so that it more easier to understand.

BaochengSu commented 3 years ago

Shouldn't we better update to the latest ofono, at least the one that dunfell provides?

I remember that the latest ofono from dunfell doesn't pass build for us. Sorry that I've already forgotten the exact build errors. Anyway, this change was made at the very early stage of the work, so I think it would be worth to retry the latest version now.

BaochengSu commented 3 years ago

Maybe leave a comment where the openssl patches for nodejs came from.

Sure, I will leave the comments in the commit messge.

jan-kiszka commented 3 years ago

Shouldn't we better update to the latest ofono, at least the one that dunfell provides?

I remember that the latest ofono from dunfell doesn't pass build for us. Sorry that I've already forgotten the exact build errors. Anyway, this change was made at the very early stage of the work, so I think it would be worth to retry the latest version now.

jan-kiszka commented 3 years ago

Sorry, fat-fingered "close".

BaochengSu commented 3 years ago

Shouldn't we better update to the latest ofono, at least the one that dunfell provides?

I remember that the latest ofono from dunfell doesn't pass build for us. Sorry that I've already forgotten the exact build errors. Anyway, this change was made at the very early stage of the work, so I think it would be worth to retry the latest version now.

Just build w/ the ofono version of dunfell, no build error. So that particular commit would be dropped.

BaochengSu commented 3 years ago

Additionally, we should check if there is more to update:

  • ofono as pointed out already
  • kernel (as already discussed privately)
  • mindconnect nodes

Then I wonder if all our bbappends are still relevant and could be dropped - or if we miss some updates. Example:

  • busybox_1.31.%.bbappend
  • e2fsprogs_%.bbappend
  • nativesdk-mingw-w64-runtime_3.%.bbappend
  • mraa_%.bbappend
  • tcf-agent_git.bbappend

Regarding mindconnect nodes, do you mean node-red-contrib-mindconnect? It's already been updated to the latest version in this PR.

jan-kiszka commented 3 years ago

Yes - oversaw that, perfect.

BaochengSu commented 3 years ago

Shouldn't we better update to the latest ofono, at least the one that dunfell provides?

I remember that the latest ofono from dunfell doesn't pass build for us. Sorry that I've already forgotten the exact build errors. Anyway, this change was made at the very early stage of the work, so I think it would be worth to retry the latest version now.

The version from dunfell is pulled in, which is 1.31.

BaochengSu commented 3 years ago

Shouldn't we better update to the latest ofono, at least the one that dunfell provides?

I remember that the latest ofono from dunfell doesn't pass build for us. Sorry that I've already forgotten the exact build errors. Anyway, this change was made at the very early stage of the work, so I think it would be worth to retry the latest version now.

The version from dunfell is pulled in, which is 1.31.