Closed vdikan closed 7 years ago
Hi Vladimir,
A good first step. Thank you.
I will eventually put it in a subdirectory “workfunction”, since it is not strictly a workchain. Maybe we can have:
workflows workfunction simple ... workchain ...
Alberto
On 8 Jun 2017, at 18:25, Vladimir Dikan notifications@github.com wrote:
A first (raw, dirty, ugly) test of workflow for Siesta that works. One executable submits a series of calculations with distorted Si-structure under one workfunction. Providing this function's pk to a command: verdi work tree
one can see them all connected. Something like this: /-create_structure [190] | |--Float [192] | |--rescale [193] | |--SiestaCalculation [198] | |--Float [199] | |--rescale [200] | |--SiestaCalculation [205] | |--Float [206]
-- run_wf [189] --rescale [207] --SiestaCalculation [212] --Float [213] --rescale [214] --SiestaCalculation [219] --Float [220] --rescale [221] \-SiestaCalculation [226]
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/albgar/aiida_siesta_plugin/pull/2
Commit Summary
• elementary workflow test File Changes
• A siesta_plugin_files/workchain/simple/Si.psf (1898) • A siesta_plugin_files/workchain/simple/simple_wf.py (151) Patch Links:
• https://github.com/albgar/aiida_siesta_plugin/pull/2.patch • https://github.com/albgar/aiida_siesta_plugin/pull/2.diff — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
A first (raw, dirty, ugly) test of workflow for Siesta that works. One executable submits a series of calculations with distorted Si-structure under one workfunction. Providing this function's pk to a command:
verdi work tree <pk>
one can see them all connected. Something like this: