Closed sluetze closed 5 months ago
For me, this feels like a mix of Kubernetes built-in functionality (init containers) and organizational requirements.
If an initialisation (e.g. of an application) takes place in a pod at start-up, this SHOULD take place in a separate Init container
Organizational requirement for app developer / manifest owner: Do not put init scripts into the main container but in an init container
It SHOULD be ensured that the initialisation terminates all processes that are already running
I do not understand this requirement in the container context. In the context of a deployment / multiple pods, initialization might also be performed when other pods of the application are still running (e.g. init version 6 during rolling upgrade, while version 5 is still running). In the context of a single Pod, init containers are inherently run at first by Kubernetes.
Kubernetes SHOULD ONLY start the other containers if the initialisation is successful.
This is a standard Kubernetes behaviour, isn't it?
Feedback is required @sluetze @ermeratos: For me this is an org-only requirement, or at maximum a manual rule. What's your opionion?
OpenShift provides the necessary resource configurations via Kubernetes. Kubernetes ensures the (process) dependencies between init containers and “normal” containers of a pod. The requirement must be implemented by application development.
I agree, its a mixture of inherently met and organizational rule.
Upstream PR merged
there doesn't seem to be anything existing in rules, we have to write them