codecov[bot]
commented
3 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 95.14%. Comparing base (
7d062c2) to head (1b14462). Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #637 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 95.14% 95.14% ======================================= Files 38 38 Lines 2285 2285 ======================================= Hits 2174 2174 Misses 111 111 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/sigma67/ytmusicapi/pull/637/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=sigma67) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/sigma67/ytmusicapi/pull/637/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=sigma67) | `95.14% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=sigma67#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
indierodo
While I was reading the docs to append video items, I got confused by the setVideoId parameter. I added the missing field to the get_playlists_id example and copied the definition to the edit playlist documentation.
I hope this is ok, it's a very small change, but I think it might help others. I really appreciate the time you take by looking at this.