Open jebal13 opened 2 years ago
How did you get the results? Could you please guide us.
Hi All,
I suggest to change just the inter-packet interval. What kind of results do you get in this case? How do they differ from the plots shown in the paper?
Best, Matteo
Hi, We tried only the latency part. The values were increased with the no. of relays instead of decreasing.
Hi, Thanks for your answer
I changed inter-packet interval (interPacketInterval = 400 (R = 28 Mbit/s), interPacketInterval = 50 (R = 228Mbit/s)) but when interPacketInterval = 50, the result is a little different. Especially latency of Donor gNB UEs and IAB nodes UE are different. Also, Is it right to plot a graph using the delay of UdpServerRX.txt? and How could you separate the latency of donor gNB UEs and IAB nodes UEs in UdpServerRX.txt? I separate users' associations using port number and their locations.
Thank you
Hi, We got the same issues as you mentioned and we are still figuring them out. We also plot the graph using the delay of UdpserverRx.txt but not sure whether it's right or not to use it. Could you please tell us how did you plot the throughput graph and what text file you used for it? Thank you
Hello, I am trying to simulate the plots in "End-to-End Simulation of Integrated Access and Backhaul at mmWaves".
So, I am changing parameters of mmwave-iab-grid.cc. interPacketInterval = 400; // because (1400 8 / 400)10^6 = 28Mbits/s p2ph.SetChannelAttribute ("Delay", TimeValue (Seconds (0.011)));// gNB to remote secer latency is 11ms I plots graph using UdpServerRX.txt. But my simulation doesn't have the same result in FIG4, 5. Could you please guide me in any small way possible to generate these graphs?
![cap2](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91536646/139522500-3d83ae2b-1205-4b1b-bc87-39821ff1752e.PNG)
Thank you