Closed malkomes closed 1 year ago
Is the goal to replace all of the ValueErrors one type at a time with the appropriate SigoptValidationError? I'm not understanding why we now throw one InvalidTypeError and everything else is a ValueError.
Is the goal to replace all of the ValueErrors one type at a time with the appropriate SigoptValidationError? I'm not understanding why we now throw one InvalidTypeError and everything else is a ValueError.
yes @Chris-Sigopt that's my plan: replace all ValueErrors
that we intentionally raise to the appropriate the SigoptValidationError
; which means that we will be reserving the stdlib
exceptions to things that we didn't anticipate --- hopefully the latter never happens, thou 🤞
requirements.txt
before merging