Closed jku closed 6 months ago
I think I kind of like the idea of separate action invocations: this also looks more meaningful on GitHub: "failure in Staging conformance" requires very different action from "failure in conformance"
I'll make a PR of this and will do some testing...
So I'm looking at doing some final testing before enabling staging test by default (changing the default value of the action input) however...
I started thinking about how this goes in the future (assume we have many more tests that support testing on staging):
xfail: "test_name@staging"
or something) and handle that inconformance_xfail()
fixture -- or add another input to the action likexfail_staging
Alternatively we might want to require running the action separately for staging: this makes it easy to manage the xfail lists separately.