Logo poll issues

[jonasmalacofilho]

The poll had 4 design options for the logo:

• 3 light versions
• 1 heavy version

I suspect this might have influenced the results, since the winner was the heavy design, but most people voted on a light one.

Perhaps a second round is needed, just between the top 2 designs.

P.S. I voted for the heavy version.

[lexoyo]

:+1: good point mate !

[JbIPS]

@lexoyo This looks like someone wants another chance :grinning:

So it would be 3 against 4 for the second turn. Fine by me but I don't know if people will vote once again.

[back2dos]

Let's have another round between logo 3 and 4 and then decide to go with logo 2 after all!

[Sayankhan]

1 and 2 are very simular. We can eliminate 1 by 1 with 2 more rounds

[markknol]

Why doesn't it use the official Haxe logo? It's not recommended to use a modified version. Please follow the official branding guidelines http://haxe.org/foundation/branding.html

Thanks for not embellishing on the logo with shadows, patterns, intricate backgrounds, or elaborate gold jewelry.

[markknol]

I could not resist to create an alternative version, hope you don't mind :smile: I tried to make it look more Haxe + silexlabs branded, and slightly more bright/exciting.

You can do whatever you want to do with it, here is the psd: http://dump.stroep.nl/wwx2016.psd

[zabojad]

Haha, nice! It seems the wwx logo will have to become an open contest...

[lexoyo]

fine by me as soon as it is open ;D

[clemos]

Ok, so here's what we're going to do: Since the Haxe logo can't be altered, and we actually preferred the Eiffel Tower idea in the first place anyway, we have decided to cancel the first poll result. We are going to come up with a couple more Eiffel-Tower-based proposals and run another poll. @markknol Please feel free to contribute with a new logo proposal ;)

[tokiop]

@markknol, great visual !

[lexoyo]

@markknol We should definitely use this