Closed tschleider closed 4 years ago
What about schema:publisher or dcterms:publisher or dcterms:creator attached to the E31_Document
entities?
+1 for using schema:publisher or dcterms:publisher!
But why attaching this property to E31_Document
? There is only the Joconde museum that seems to have instances of this class. I would attach it to the E22_Man-made_Object
entity.
Well, formally the museum is not the publisher of the E22_Man-made_Object
but of the record describing it. It is surprising to me that there is no E31_Document
in general.
You're absolutely right, the museum should not be the publisher of the E22_Man-made_Object
but of the D1_Digital_Object
which is materializing the record (French notice)
Ah right, Digital Object!
We now have a property dc:publisher
attached to D1 objects pointing to the museums identified by
http://data.silknow.org/organization/ + DATASET_NAME
Currently, the museum is just retrievable by its named graph URI, but not as a direct property inside the graph. Once we replace the internal UUID generation from filename to internal museum ID we also need an information about the original JSON file name inside the graph.