\brk ⌊\brk\imp so that some of the water will be above it\imp\brk ⌋\brk \brk ⌊\brk\imp and some will be below it\imp\brk ⌋\brk.”
89 complains about the back to back \brk-s, underlined above. If possible this kind of thing should be allowed. So can we make an exception in this test for \brk ⌋\brk \brk ⌊\brk (note the closing and opening brackets)?
In TNND Genesis 1:6b is the following:
\brk ⌊\brk\imp so that some of the water will be above it\imp\brk ⌋\brk \brk ⌊\brk\imp and some will be below it\imp\brk ⌋\brk.”
89 complains about the back to back \brk-s, underlined above. If possible this kind of thing should be allowed. So can we make an exception in this test for \brk ⌋\brk \brk ⌊\brk (note the closing and opening brackets)?
I put this in TNDD XXD 89:2. S/r done.
Thx,
Steve