Closed gmartin7 closed 8 years ago
So I see how you made the test pass but I'm not sure I understand the impact for users of the library. So when a user decides a string is no longer used they tag it somehow?
Review status: 0 of 2 files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.
src/L10NSharp/LocalizedStringCache.cs, line 613 at r1 (raw file):
{ newNode = new LocTreeNode(OwningManager, groupChain[i], null, nodeKey); nodeCollection.Add(newNode);
Was this intended?
Comments from Reviewable
Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r1. Review status: 1 of 2 files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.
Comments from Reviewable
Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r1. Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.
Comments from Reviewable
Yes, they mark it with a nolongerused property. And anyway, this code is in the part that handles the x-group property which I've never seen used before.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.
_Comments from Reviewable_
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.
src/L10NSharp/LocalizedStringCache.cs, line 613 at r1 (raw file):
Yes, I couldn't see any possible reason to add something to a collection that was being overwritten on the next line.
Comments from Reviewable
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, all commit checks successful.
src/L10NSharp/LocalizedStringCache.cs, line 613 at r1 (raw file):
I suppose, but I'm curious about how it works with newNode. I see you didn't break anything so I don't really have any objections. :smile:
Comments from Reviewable
I'll admit to a similar curiosity! :worried:
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.
Comments from Reviewable
This change is