issues
search
sillywalk
/
defect-prediction
GNU General Public License v3.0
2
stars
2
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
RQ4: Which identification and prediction system perform best for buggy commits? (P_OPT20)
#20
HuyTu7
opened
5 years ago
0
RQ2: Which predicting method is best for buggy commits? (P_OPT20)
#19
HuyTu7
opened
5 years ago
0
RQ1.2: Which labelling method can generate better data miner for defect prediction tasks? (P_OPT20)
#18
HuyTu7
opened
5 years ago
0
RQ3: How is Fastread+FFT comparing to Commit.Guru (Keyword+LR) for defect prediction on commit level?
#17
HuyTu7
closed
5 years ago
1
RQ2: How are defect prediction on commit level of human lable data based on Fastread labeled data vs Keyword labeled data?
#16
HuyTu7
closed
5 years ago
1
RQ1: How close are Fastread and Keyword to actual Human Labeling
#15
HuyTu7
closed
5 years ago
1
RQ1: is keyword better than fastread for labeling?
#14
HuyTu7
closed
5 years ago
1
RQ4: Why FFT?
#13
HuyTu7
closed
5 years ago
4
Comparison between different tricks for data collections!
#12
HuyTu7
opened
5 years ago
2
Pseudo labeling using 30% of the FR labeled data to predict on the rest + Effect Size Test
#11
HuyTu7
opened
5 years ago
0
Disagreement Rate Graphs (9 projects)
#10
HuyTu7
opened
5 years ago
0
Effect Size of the remaining 5 datasets.
#9
HuyTu7
opened
5 years ago
0
Standardized Results so far
#8
HuyTu7
opened
6 years ago
1
State-of-the-art Keywords JIT in comparison with Keywords + Release Level
#7
HuyTu7
opened
6 years ago
1
FastRead Commit Messages + Defect Prediction
#6
HuyTu7
closed
6 years ago
0
Keyword Searches + Commit Level Defect Prediction
#5
HuyTu7
closed
6 years ago
0
Defect Prediction on Release Level with Keyword Searches
#4
HuyTu7
closed
6 years ago
0
Defect Prediction on Release Level with Keyword Searches
#3
HuyTu7
opened
6 years ago
2
Commits Messages Bugy
#2
HuyTu7
opened
6 years ago
4
RQ4
#1
rahlk
opened
6 years ago
0