Closed mhosken closed 5 years ago
Shows some styling information. The comment on 'more narrow' says that if we want the glyph to have the same width, then this is what to narrow. I don't think we need to keep the same width and so there is no need to narrow, unless that helps balance the glyph artistically.
u1032.kham is wrong. Use u1086.kham instead. So a font should NOT have a u1032.kham in it.
Four khamti characters consist of a left hand bowl with an inset small circle containing the dot. The circles have been inset to reduce character size, but the small distance between the dot and the main bowl is causing legibility problems. They request that the small circle not be inset and that it run straight down from the main bowl and so sit to the left of the character. Changing the character width is no problem. Affected chars: u1075.kham, u1078.kham, u1022.kham, uAA63.kham
u1002.kham is used for a ra main consonant (and U+AA73 is deprecated). They would like the right hand side of this to be straight rather than curved (basically from the point the right curve is vertical, follow vertically to the base line). The difference does not need to be marked and is stylistic. This also needs to be added to the list of characters that can take a VS.
Adjust APs for U+1075 to take upper vowels centered over the middle of the bowl as per other Burmese characters and not hanging right. This may need an aiton variation, but doesn't stop this from being fixed.
Adjust lower diacritic AP for U+107B so that lower vowels sit under the right hand bowl rather than the left.