I don't think there is anything to be done with u103A since this glyph is already sharp.
I expect that the design change will also affect: u100B_u100C, u100C, u100C.thai, u1024, u104C, u104D, u1051_u100C, u105D, u109F?, uAA65, uAA6D, uAA74-uAA77, uAA7A
There is considerable variation over what is acceptable styling. Compare the sample above with u103C taken from PyiDaungsu, the government standard font:
I think the following questions need to be answered:
What is the precise shape of u103C desired, and agreed on?
While the technical differences are minimal, this will radically change the style of the font and therefore, I would recommend we call the font with these alternate glyphs by a different name, even if we build them together in one repository. What should this name be?
What is the ideal weight for the regular of this new font (and perhaps for a Padauk New)?
We have received this request:
Please can we sharpen the corners for characters like: ြ, ျ ည. See this example:
An initial analysis suggests that this affects the following glyphs:
u103C, u103C. u1009, u1009., u1014_u1010_u103C, u101E_u1010_u103C, u1025, u1026, u1029, u102A, uAA7A, uAA7A.aiph
I don't think there is anything to be done with u103A since this glyph is already sharp.
I expect that the design change will also affect: u100B_u100C, u100C, u100C.thai, u1024, u104C, u104D, u1051_u100C, u105D, u109F?, uAA65, uAA6D, uAA74-uAA77, uAA7A
There is considerable variation over what is acceptable styling. Compare the sample above with u103C taken from PyiDaungsu, the government standard font:
I think the following questions need to be answered: