There are four glyphs that have different names in regular and bold, and two glyphs that are in a different order between regular and bold.
I generated a list of glyphnames (in glyph order) for both fonts and diffed them with Tortoise. Here is a screenshot showing the differences (left side is bold, right side is regular):
I'm not confident of all the implications, but one is that at least those first four are not getting renamed by FFChangeGlyphNames when building the Bold font.
There are four glyphs that have different names in regular and bold, and two glyphs that are in a different order between regular and bold.
I generated a list of glyphnames (in glyph order) for both fonts and diffed them with Tortoise. Here is a screenshot showing the differences (left side is bold, right side is regular):![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6842108/27887481-3c6089fa-619e-11e7-8a34-b1112bf8c113.png)
I'm not confident of all the implications, but one is that at least those first four are not getting renamed by FFChangeGlyphNames when building the Bold font.