kif
commented
9 years ago On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:13:06 -0700 "Christopher J. Wright" notifications@github.com wrote:
Would it be possible to have a function which we could call to produce the calibration configuration dictionary (the key word arguments for pyFAI.geometry.Geometry)? My hope is that the signature would look like this:
geometry_keywords = magic_calibration_function( img, ring_positions, d_spacings, detector, mask, initial_guess_dictionary)
There is a calibration function which almost does what you are looking for:
Procedural version of calibration
def calib(img, calibrant, detector, basename="from_ipython", reconstruct=False, dist=0.1, gaussian=None, interactive=True): """ Procedural interfact for calibration
@param img: 2d array representing the calibration image
@param calibrant: Instance of Calibrant, set-up with wavelength
@param detector: Detector instance containing the mask
@param basename: output file base
@param recontruct: perform image reconstruction of masked pixel ?
@param dist: initial distance
@param gaussian: width of the gaussian used for difference of gaussian in the "massif" peak-picking algorithm
@param interactive: set to False for testing
@retrun: azimuthal integrator object
"""You would like to inject in addition the control points ? it looks like the biggest difference. And it should not be too complicated (actually the signature of this function is not yet fixed).
Cheers,
CJ-Wright
tacaswell
Would it be possible to have a function which we could call to produce the calibration configuration dictionary (the key word arguments for pyFAI.geometry.Geometry)? My hope is that the signature would look like this:
My hope is that this would eliminate as much user involvement and file IO as possible, as the peaks will have already been found, and all the file IO will be accomplished before or after calling this function. Thank you very much!