Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Amit, please look at the code and come up with suggestion: what's in your
opinion is wrong (not so good) and what should be refactored and in what way.
Original comment by Andrey.D...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2010 at 2:26
ok..i will find
Original comment by amit.ha...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2010 at 2:31
[deleted comment]
One thing I do not want is for the ui to contact yahoo directly.
I want to have a local service which wil cache the data locally.
Original comment by atra...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2010 at 5:35
Amit, if you are not working on it , I would like to work on it.
Original comment by junaid...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 9:48
I am working on it ..why don't if you would like ..we can both work on it ....
Original comment by amit.ha...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 11:28
Let's keep one task to one developer. Amit, can you please upload your design
document soon? If you don't have even the design, after almost 20 days, let's
give this task to junaidmcs.
Original comment by atra...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 4:30
I have reassigned this to junaidmcs (Muhammad)
Original comment by atra...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 7:02
Muhamad, please upload here what is your approach (i.e. design).
The requirements are:
- Separate Yahoo DataService code from UI code.
- Make actually separate Jar files which can be installed separately (i.e. data
only)
- The DataService should update a percentage download complete shown in the
System Tray
Original comment by atra...@gmail.com
on 4 Jul 2010 at 7:05
Curently, I am facing problem to checkout the latest code. There is RA layer
problem. I will try with completely new check out , after this I need to
require 4 hrs to decide my approach , that how I can seperate the Data layer
from UI layer.
Original comment by junaid...@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2010 at 3:28
Please see
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/quantdesk/message/126
"Re: issues when checking out the code from SVN (resolved)"
and the previous messages in the thread
on the "RA layer" problem during the check-out.
Original comment by Andrey.D...@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2010 at 4:40
Please expand my hrs limit from 0 to 4.
Original comment by junaid...@gmail.com
on 8 Jul 2010 at 8:01
My first priority is to Separate Yahoo DataService code from UI code
Current Application flow:
- When AnalyzerUI class is loaded StockModel instance is created
- This stockmodel create a UpdateStocksThread
- This thread is resposible to fetch stock data by using MyYahooStockServer
- After this AnalyzerUI constructor is called with stockmodel instance. In
setupComponents() there is another thread StockThread to get all stock data by
using model instance
Note: Issue 21 shows that all SWT components are being replaced by swing
components, that will be help full to us because mostly swing components follow
the MVC.
My New Approach:
- All code from AnalyzerUI will be removed that can call model/yahooserver
directly.
- All jar files will be removed which are using to fetch stock data by using
UpdateStocksThread
- All classes related to fetch stock data will be moved into a new package in
QuanDesk_DataServices
- AnalyzerUI class can only access to a controller class.
- A controller class can only call to model class after some validation check.
- A model class can fetch the data directly from yahoo stock server.
- The way to fetch data from yahoo server will be like this:
AnalyzerUI.aStockList = controller.getAllStock();
and the implementation of controller.getAllStock() could be like this
List<Stock> getAllStock(){
if(isValid)
return createModel().getUpdatedStock();
}
- Estimate hrs to complete this task is 15-20 , but first we should wait for
completing issu 21
Original comment by junaid...@gmail.com
on 10 Jul 2010 at 2:37
junaidmcs, thank you for your analysis. Please provide some more details which
are not above:
1. UpdateStocksThread, MyYahooStockServer, and StockModel which will become the
new DataService should run by themselves as a separate application, with option
to Minimize To System Tray.
2. The DataService should include it's own Derby jars and use Derby (in Derby
Network Server mode) to store all its data.
3. A new version of StockModel, probably call it StockModelDAO, should provide
a Data Access Object layer using JDBC and Hibernate.
4. The UI should use StockModelDAO to access the data from DataService via JDBC.
Please confirm if all these details are included in your 15-20 hour estimate,
or provide updated estimate.
Original comment by atra...@gmail.com
on 10 Jul 2010 at 3:47
Currently, stocks data is saved into csv file and then retrieved from this. In
my estimated hrs I didnt consider the Derby database or option to minimize to
system tray , I focused only to seperate data layer from UI as in first phase.
I checked and found that there are 27 attributes for a stock record which are
saving into csv file. I suggest, first we follow the same technique to
save/retreive stock data and then I will replace it by Derby database. But if
you like to save data in derby database instead of csv file then let me know I
will analyse to estimate the time frame for it.
Original comment by junaid...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2010 at 12:41
My opinion is that this is solely about separation of responsibilities between
the data layer and UI, not about transitioning from CSV file to embedded Derby
DB. I'd say it's more a prerequisite for such transition: when the data
services are separated from the UI, it is much easier to switch the data
storage technology.
IMO, currently the application is lacking features more than embedded DB or any
other technological "decorations".
P.S. Please keep oDesk weekly hour limit discussions outside the IssueTracker
and Yahoo Group: discuss it in private correspondence (via e-mail or oDesk
messages) with Alex.
Original comment by Andrey.D...@gmail.com
on 16 Jul 2010 at 3:04
when issue 21 is done please let me know . I will start my work after it.
Original comment by junaid...@gmail.com
on 22 Jul 2010 at 1:11
Owner: junaidmcs -> Andrey.Desyatnikov
Priority: Medium -> Critical, since this issue blocks Issue 28 "stock scanning
feature is unacceptably slow" which is Critical.
Original comment by Andrey.D...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2010 at 11:17
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Andrey.D...@gmail.com
on 13 Jun 2010 at 4:13