Closed AnaRhisT94 closed 3 years ago
Did sfmrecon
succeed in reconstructing the scene? Also, bundle2pset
does not accept a -F2
argument. Did you use scene2pset
instead?
Did
sfmrecon
succeed in reconstructing the scene? Also,bundle2pset
does not accept a-F2
argument. Did you usescene2pset
instead?
Yup, I ran again sfmrecon
and then tried both scene2pset
with F2
and bundle2pset
too, it doesn't work.
scene2pset
outputs an empty .ply
file and bundlet2pset
outputs this error:
Can you please provide the console output of sfmrecon?
Can you please provide the console output of sfmrecon?
It does work with dmrecon, smvs also does this process but much better.
When doing w/ dmrecon and bundlet2pset
it reconstructs a model that doesn't look good, the results of smvs are really good.
I'm not sure why sfmrecon doesn't work though.
the log file:
Let's clarify a few things here.
bundle2pset
outputs the sparse point cloud from SfM, and depending on what your expectations are, that may "not look good". But as I said, it's sparse, not dense.makescene
-> sfmrecon
-> bundle2pset
.scene2pset
outputs a dense reconstruction which you can either get through dmrecon
or smvs
.makescene
-> sfmrecon
-> dmrecon
OR smvs
-> scene2pset
.Having said that, what exactly is your problem now?
Please reopen if there are remaining questions.
Hi,
I've used
makescene -i IMAGE_DIR SCENE_DIR
andsfmrecon SCENE_DIR
,I'm trying to create a
.ply
object and visualize it in MeshLab, after using the commandbundle2pset -F2
I'm getting a.ply
format file that weights 300 bytes and I don't see anything in MeshLab (# of vertices is zero)Output:![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33227900/112765304-4453fd00-9015-11eb-8093-7dc9464d0a7d.png)
Note: When I used smvs, it worked well https://github.com/flanggut/smvs , it says there that: This project is intended as an alternative multi-view stereo step and replaces the dmrecon and scene2pset applications with the smvsrecon