Open simonjwright opened 1 year ago
This arose with SF bug 79, no longer visible, but traces visible in the SF_Bug_79 domain in Regressions.uml.
SF_Bug_79
Regressions.uml
The fix there is very clumsy.
A better fix would generate with {Domain}.{Class}; in the using class’s package spec, and {Class}.Handle in its subprograms.
with {Domain}.{Class};
{Class}.Handle
The second part is easy, but the first part would need a lot more work; and, interactions with other classes should be managed via relationships!
This arose with SF bug 79, no longer visible, but traces visible in the
SF_Bug_79
domain inRegressions.uml
.The fix there is very clumsy.
A better fix would generate
with {Domain}.{Class};
in the using class’s package spec, and{Class}.Handle
in its subprograms.The second part is easy, but the first part would need a lot more work; and, interactions with other classes should be managed via relationships!