Closed zonca closed 4 years ago
@keskitalo do we have hitmaps from MSS-0001 we can use?
@zonca the simulation is only 20% complete but the hitmaps for the subsets are designed to be very similar. All of the results are being written here: /global/cscratch1/sd/keskital/pwg-scripts/pwg-tds/mss-0001/genesis/out/00000000
. Hit maps are the files that end with _hmap.fits
.
get the new noise model: https://github.com/simonsobs/V3_calc/issues/2#issuecomment-536060305
the available hitmaps are:
LT0_UHF1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits LT5_MFS2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT0_UHF2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits LT6_LF1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT1_UHF1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits LT6_LF2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT1_UHF2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits ST0_UHF1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT2_MFF1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits ST0_UHF2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT2_MFF2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits ST1_MFF1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT3_MFF1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits ST1_MFF2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT3_MFF2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits ST2_MFS1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT4_MFS1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits ST2_MFS2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT4_MFS2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits ST3_LF1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
LT5_MFS1_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits ST3_LF2_01_of_20.nominal_telescope_all_time_all_hmap.fits
Tubes have slightly different scanning:
@keskitalo I plan to simulate them separately, which increases the number of maps from 16 to 22 for each noise realization, but it makes it easier to compare with the time domain simulations. Do you agree?
discussing noise splits at https://github.com/simonsobs/map_based_simulations/issues/30
about the disk space required to store the simulations with variable NSIDE (#18) and simulating separately the different tubes as the TOD simulations do. I get:
Implementing noise correlations, see as example cross-corralation between the lowest frequency channels, Full notebook
Ok, the HEALPix version of the release is ready, CAR will follow:
https://github.com/simonsobs/map_based_simulations/blob/master/202002_noise
@mhasself can you pelase crosscheck the noise parameters in https://github.com/simonsobs/map_based_simulations/blob/master/202002_noise/noise.toml? in particular rolloff_ell
.
@mhasself do you think rolloff_ell=50
is fine?
Yes, I think ell=50 is acceptable.
Apologies for the slow reply.
thanks!