Open ktcrowley opened 3 weeks ago
@ktcrowley is this a schedule you generated or one of mine? The software az limit has been set at 405 for awhile so I'm very confused how that got in. https://github.com/simonsobs/scheduler/blob/e68c22a93cd6c5d056c4a322a119eca2b8fcbb9c/src/schedlib/policies/satp1.py#L240
ok yeah, this came from mine. @mhasself @guanyilun BIG issue in the simple-sun branch. I apparently left the moon scan on az_branch: 270
without noticing and it allowed me to produce a scan that went outside our stated Azimuth limits. This really should not be allowed to be possible.
Config file the reproduces the error
t0: 2024-08-20T20:00:00+00:00
t1: 2024-08-21T20:00:00+00:00
t0_state_file: None
elevation: 60
boresight: 0
az_speed: 0.5
az_accel: 1.0
hwp_dir: True
stow_at_end: True
run_relock: False
cal_targets:
- source: moon
# boresight: # if not specified, use scan boresight
elevation: 50
focus: 'ws0,ws4,ws1'
allow_partial: False
az_branch: 270
- source: jupiter
# boresight: # if not specified, use scan boresight
elevation: 48
focus: 'ws1'
allow_partial: True
az_branch: 270
I'm not sure this is a common fault in calibration obs or point source obs, but we had a surprise ACU agent alarm during a
generate_scan
command. The full schedule is here: https://site.simonsobs.org/schedules/satp1/2024-08-20T20%3A00%3A00%2B00%3A00_2024-08-21T20%3A00%3A00%2B00%3A00.pyRelevant commands in block below:
I'm not sure where the safe az range is specified in the
satp1.py
policy file onsimple-sun
branch, but it seems it may not be properly set. Our HW limits are -90 to 450, but we want to program a safe distance away from the software pre-limits, which define a narrower range. Let me know if these numbers are needed.