COMPUTATIONAL_MODEL:
definition: Model category according to the RoMM
parent: CUBA.CUDS_COMPONENT
RoMM defines categories for models, not for computational models ...
RoMM considers "Computational modelling" and "Computational Representation",
but not "Computational model".
Furthermore, according to RoMM, ELECTRONIC, ATOMISTIC, MESOSCOPIC, and CONTINUUM
are model categories.
So could we have here simply "MODEL" or "MODEL_CATEGORY"?
MODEL_EQUATION:
definition: The model equations are represented by all physics equations and material relations according to the RoMM
models: []
parent: CUBA.CUDS_COMPONENT
variables: []
According to RoMM, "Together the physics or chemistry equations and materials relations are called
governing equations and they form one model."
So should we have GOVERNING_EQUATION instead of MODEL_EQUATION?
COMPUTATIONAL_MODEL: definition: Model category according to the RoMM parent: CUBA.CUDS_COMPONENT
RoMM defines categories for models, not for computational models ... RoMM considers "Computational modelling" and "Computational Representation", but not "Computational model".
Furthermore, according to RoMM, ELECTRONIC, ATOMISTIC, MESOSCOPIC, and CONTINUUM are model categories.
So could we have here simply "MODEL" or "MODEL_CATEGORY"?
MODEL_EQUATION: definition: The model equations are represented by all physics equations and material relations according to the RoMM models: [] parent: CUBA.CUDS_COMPONENT variables: []
According to RoMM, "Together the physics or chemistry equations and materials relations are called governing equations and they form one model."
So should we have GOVERNING_EQUATION instead of MODEL_EQUATION?