A framework that aims to achieve interoperability between software such as simulation engines, databases and data repositories using a knowledge graph as the common language.
In case of vectors, length, data range and value restriction might be a bit more complicated. But I think this is not a huge priority to be implemented since we are ontologizing in the EMMO-way, without any vectors as data properties.
As a follow-up of #821, I was also asked for the functionality to check the actual values of the Cuds.
For my opion this makes absolutely sense if you want to write a unittest for your function which is generating Cuds with actual data.
However, my suggestion would be that this might also overwrite the cardinality with a value-keyword in the case of data properties:
Restriction to length
Following a similar pattern as the cardinality, this value might e.g. in case of a string restrict the length (see example above) or the actual value:
Restriction of value
In the case of floats, bools and ints, there is no restriction of the length needed, but rather a statement towards the data range:
Restriction of range
... or the actual value:
Restriction of value
In case of vectors, length, data range and value restriction might be a bit more complicated. But I think this is not a huge priority to be implemented since we are ontologizing in the EMMO-way, without any vectors as data properties.