simplesamlphp / SAML-tracer

Browser extension for examining SAML messages
https://addons.mozilla.org/nl/firefox/addon/saml-tracer/
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
142 stars 39 forks source link

Logo #42

Closed khlr closed 5 years ago

khlr commented 6 years ago

I'm still not too happy with the SAML logo (SAML Logo) in the browser toolbar. And I don't think it serves as a too good logo at the Firefox Addons page either ;-)

So, I assembled all my creative skills ... ugly ... and made some drafts for a new logo of SAML-tracer. Interpretation help: It should represent the stylized letter S. And the whole scene should depict some kind of trace ;-) Do you like one of them?

draft 4a:

image

draft4b:

image

draft 4c:

image

draft 4d:

image

draft 5a:

image

draft 5b:

image

draft 5c:

image

draft 6a:

image

jaimeperez commented 6 years ago

Oh well, I can tell you then that your creative skills are awesome compared to mine 😝

If I have to choose, I think I'd stick with 4d, as I believe it would be easier to see. I like all of them though, and it's probably much better than my initial idea to include a loupe icon 😆

khlr commented 6 years ago

I had something like that in mind, too (see draft 5a above). But I think most times a loupe icon is utilized for a search functionality rather than for an inspect functionality.

jaimeperez commented 6 years ago

That's true...

What about putting the loupe between XML angles? Something like: < 🔍>. Maybe it's too wide for a square logo, but just an idea...

khlr commented 6 years ago

Please see 5c 🤔

thijskh commented 6 years ago

I actually quite like 5c...

khlr commented 6 years ago

I added another one: 6a But I'm afraid one doesn't recognize the key in the 16px icon...

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

Why not best of both; something like this: https://goo.gl/images/bSh9Mc

khlr commented 6 years ago

I really (!) like that icon, @tvdijen! I played a little bit around with that model, but unfortunately I don't manage to make our drafts to look similar without plainly plagiarizing it. And I don't feel comfortable with somewhat copying someone other's work. That's the least thing I wanna do. I hope you understand my point 🙂

I also tried to make another category-4-draft with dots and lines. Bit in the end this looked more like a bicycle chain than like a trace... 😁

Are there any other ideas? Or should we stick with the current drafts? Or would it be better if we did not take any of them? I think the most important thing is the 16px representation, because that's the icon which the user sees in the browser tool bar and which should ideally be easily associated with SAML-tracer. And personally I think, none of the 16px drafts is outstanding in that regard 🤔

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

It`s actually a licensed image, so for a couple of bucks we could actually legaly plagiarize it 😉

khlr commented 6 years ago

Yep, we could simply buy it. But did you take a look at the license agreement? Maybe I get this wrong, but it says: "Not allowed: [...] Use an Item in a logo, trademark, or service mark." Unfortunately that's exactly our purpose: to use it in a logo 😕

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

Oh, that's too bad... I hadn't read it because I brought it up for inspiration in the first place...

jaimeperez commented 6 years ago

That's a pity indeed...

I'm thinking about it a little, and I believe the only ones that would be seen easily in the toolbar are 5a/b or 6a. Another option, though, would be to have two versions of the logo:

Would that make sense?

khlr commented 6 years ago

I think the inversion is a really good idea. This has the nice side effect, that the icon seems more "baked into" the browser.

Here are some impressions:

draft 4d:

image

draft 5b:

image

draft 5c:

image

draft 6a:

image

khlr commented 6 years ago

I think 5b is really clear und bold. Unfortunately it looks like a search tool. I probably wouldn't expect SAML-tracer behind that icon ;-)

6a might be ok... But I still think it's not too easy to recognize the key symbol...

5c is better, I think. But unfortunately it's quite light. 4d might be ok as well.

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

5b : definitely not suitable for anything other than a search-button... 5c : just doesn't do it for me 6a : a key has no connection to SAML for me

I'd go with 4d if I'd had to pick one of these

jaimeperez commented 6 years ago

Would any of these concepts make sense?

khlr commented 6 years ago

Well, I think I wouldn't associate a puzzle piece with SAML. The padlock is equally seems appropriate/inappropriate as the key symbol. And I think both are problematic in 16px.

The code-icon will certainly look good in 16px, but it's absolutely not unique. 😉 And to me it would more apply something related to coding.

It's not easy 🤔😉

The concept of a "token" is something veeery abstract. This makes it awfully hard to create a visual association for it. So if this term doesn't come into consideration, then we should maybe focus on the second term: the "trace"?

That's the reason I quite like draft 4d, although there may be optimizations needed. The depicted "S" is fairly crooked. I could try make this look "better". Or could the crooked look be something like a unique characteristic?

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

My girl is willing to try and replicate the licensed icon without plagiarizing it, if we still like that one?

khlr commented 6 years ago

It's probably a good idea to ask a more creative person, anyways 😊

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

The girlfriend came up with the following: img-20180310-wa0005 Personally, I kinda like 4+5

khlr commented 6 years ago

Nice, this looks very promising 👍

The angle brackets inside the loupe are a very good idea, I think! Could she alter draft 1 or 2 to have a "usual" grasp instead of the connected dots (as in drafts 3-5)?

And I'd be very interested in 16px representations 😉

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

Are those toolbar icons really 16x16? They look more like 24x24 to me Anyway, the grasp shouldn't be a problem if we decide to go with 1 or 2...

khlr commented 6 years ago

Yep, unfortunately they're 16px...

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

img-20180310-wa0012

khlr commented 6 years ago

They're all really easily recognizable! 👍

Well I guess then it's only a matter of personal preference. So if I had to choose, I'd pick no. 2. My second choice would be no. 3.

Well... As I wrote my comment earlier today, I watched the screenshots on my smartphone. Now I can see, that they're pasted into existing browser-screenshots ;-) So the icons may actually not be as sharp as I thought when they're "really" 16px ;-)

jaimeperez commented 6 years ago

They look wonderful!

I think I'd go for no. 4 or 2 from the last screenshot, though we should check how they actually look like in a real browser...

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

How can we test this? In what format/size do you want me to export them?

khlr commented 6 years ago

Do you have the possibility to clone the repo? Then you could simply modify the browser action entry in the manifest.json. There you'd have to provide your new icon as 16px PNG.

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

I can try.. But wouldn't I need a developer version of Firefox for that? Anyway, I've asked for 16x16px PNG-exports.. Probably tomorrow night

khlr commented 6 years ago

That's not necessary. You can debug extensions with any version of Firefox 😊 Please, take a look at the SAML-tracer readme. The relevant resources are linked there.

If you don't have the time right now, I can assist you with that or create the pull request for you. 👍

jaimeperez commented 6 years ago

@tvdijen did you test the different icons?

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

This kind of fell of my radar.. I need to get my hands on the Illustrator files so I can make the 16x16 exports. Hopefully this weekend

tvdijen commented 6 years ago

Unfortunately, I can't get Adobe Illustrator installed on my PC :-( Perhaps anyone else that has it and can make an 16x16 export? no4.zip