Closed tvdijen closed 1 year ago
Ideally we would support ^2.1 || ^3.0, but a few backwards incompatibilities have been identified;
^2.1 || ^3.0
CBOR\Tag\EpochTag CBOR\Tag\PositiveBigIntegerTag CBOR\Tag\TagObjectManager
There is no changelog or upgrade note available.
EpochTag is an empty class wrapped around CBOR\Tag\DatetimeTag, so that's an easy fix. PositiveBigIntegerTag is the same and becomes UnsignedBigIntegerTag TagObjectManager becomes TagManager
Closed in e39da59
tvdijen
commented
1 year ago
Ideally we would support
^2.1 || ^3.0, but a few backwards incompatibilities have been identified;CBOR\Tag\EpochTag CBOR\Tag\PositiveBigIntegerTag CBOR\Tag\TagObjectManager
There is no changelog or upgrade note available.
EpochTag is an empty class wrapped around CBOR\Tag\DatetimeTag, so that's an easy fix. PositiveBigIntegerTag is the same and becomes UnsignedBigIntegerTag TagObjectManager becomes TagManager