Closed navv1234 closed 9 years ago
When I run that profile through simc v30 with ptr=1 I get:
slam Count= 52.2| 7.16sec DPE= 15714| 9% DPET= 10407 DPR=1134.4
pDPS=1818 Miss=0.00% Hit=12606|10280|17467 Crit=29356|23356|39686|18.6%
which is different from both of your numbers.....
When you run in the gui, it generates two files: simc_gui.simc and simc_report.html
Could you include both of those files in the issue?
Reported by natehieter
on 2011-02-05 23:51:37
I'll attach those, but do you have the same buffs selected? Those look very similar
to the numbers I get with full buffs and debuffs. As I mentioned I was testing only
with self-buffs (sunder, bshout, and blood frenzy/trauma).
Self-buffed: slam Count= 52.7| 7.81sec DPE= 12369| 9% DPET= 8048
DPR= 898.9 pDPS=1299 Miss=0.00% Hit=10473|9041|15744 Crit=24684|20541|35771|13.3%
Full buffs/debuffs: slam Count= 58.0| 7.16sec DPE= 15420| 9% DPET=
10211 DPR=1115.3 pDPS=1784 Miss=0.00% Hit=12432|10018|17467 Crit=28837|22760|39686|18.2%
Also, I couldn't help but notice that the Slam numbers were very close to 30% apart,
which is how much LttS provides to Slam on the PTR. Looking through the warrior engine
file, I found some PTR LttS code under MS, OP, and Execute, but not Slam. Am I interpreting
this wrong or is that the cause?
Reported by remix1@live.com
on 2011-02-06 00:40:18
Went ahead and plugged in a talent build without any points in LttS and ran it.
slam Count= 52.4| 7.82sec DPE= 12376|10% DPET= 8052 DPR= 901.2
pDPS=1293 Miss=0.00% Hit=10471|9041|15744 Crit=24724|20541|35771|13.4%
Compare to self-buff numbers posted above. So LttS just needs to effect Slam for PTR
version and it's fixed.
Reported by remix1@live.com
on 2011-02-06 00:53:31
Sweet! You get my Favorite User of the Week award! We have a bit of indigestion at
the moment (tons of changes) so I can't spin a release immediately.
I have the code-snapshot for v30. I'll put out a v30.1 from there in a couple hours.
Reported by natehieter
on 2011-02-06 01:04:08
This issue was closed by revision r6755.
Reported by delmortis1
on 2011-02-06 01:24:08
Fixed
I've fixed this in r6755
Reported by delmortis1
on 2011-02-06 01:24:48
Originally reported on Google Code with ID 458
Reported by
remix1@live.com
on 2011-02-05 22:41:26