sinara-hw / Booster

Modular 8-channel RF power amplifier
Other
16 stars 3 forks source link

Higher power instability #10

Closed hartytp closed 6 years ago

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow measurement setup:

See the attached video (apologies for filming upside down on my phone!):

Are you able to reproduce this? Are there any other tests you would like me to perform?

Thanks

hartytp commented 6 years ago

https://drive.google.com/open?id=18rjKjgueQRWgvrGoNTXqZU5HJNA7Z3WH

hartytp commented 6 years ago

The measurement I made on the power supply rails with a scope was not very precise. But, I would have thought it was good enough for to catch issue large enough to cause a 1dB change in the amplifier's output power.

Maybe this is some issue to do with the bias voltage?

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Voltages on these two rails look correct: 27.9V and 4.94V. No noticeable change in the DC level when looking on a scope as I turn the RF on/off. AC coupling and looking on a finer scale, I do not see any obvious changes in the noise level as I turn the RF on/off.

So, I do not think either of these supplies are our issue here.

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

You can also have a look at the negative bias voltage: obraz

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Thanks Greg! Tomorrow, I'll see if I can reproduce this with the lid removed from the RF module. If I can, I'll set something up to automatically toggle between input power setpoints every few seconds and probe all pins on the d-type. I'll let you know what I see.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

I see the same behaviour on channel 1 as well (was previously only looking at channel 0).

NB I didn't try adding the 10uF capacitor to the negative rail yet, but based on my measurements, I don't think that's the issue. Let me know if you want me to try doing that.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow when do you think that Maciej/Tomek will be able to look at this? I think we need to understand this before producing the next revision of Booster (which I want to do asap). If they can't look at it soon, then I'll do some more work myself. I think the next thing is to use the test points (which someone very kindly added) to measure the RF power at various stages in the circuit to determine where this effect originates.

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

The University is closed till 6th May. We have bank holidays. All people are usually far away from Warsaw because we have real summer (roughly 30 degrees) since a few days. So you can speed up the things a little. Once you manage to use IDC cables to get into the test points, you can identify which stage is causing the problems. To enable certain test point, one need to solder the jumper.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow that's fine.

I'll do what I can then.

I'm jealous of you having the sun. Make sure you all enjoy it :)

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

I moved with my laptop to the garden to enjoy it a little :)

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Well, I'm sure we can find a few days' slack in our timeframe, so don't feel like you have to work during the holiday on our behalf.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Interestingly, I don't see this behaviour on channels 2-4. There, the output power seems quite stable.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Nevermind, I do see this on those channels, but only at 1dB higher input powers.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

I connected the UFL test points (thanks to whoever added those!) via 1k resistors to allow me to debug this better. Nothing obviously wrong on P1 or P2. On P5, I see the output power increase by about 0.5dB after the RF input is turned on, but it's hard to tell if this is just a normal thermal warm up transient. P5, I see the output power increase by 0.5dB as the overall output power decreases by 1dB....

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Looking again here https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/21218399/39369489-5979e886-4a34-11e8-83a0-8aa87172623f.png it's interesting to note that when the overall output power decreases, the power in the second harmonic increases. That seems consistent with this being a biasing issue in some component.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow hmmm...well, I'm not sure the measurements I've made have really tracked the issue down much better. I think it might be best to wait until Monday, when Maciej/Tomek can look at this properly, since they understand the circuit better than I do and are more likely to get to the bottom of this.

Let me know if you need any help reproducing this.

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

@hartytp do you observe any form of hysteresis ? Does it have form of time or only amplitude?

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@hartytp do you observe any form of hysteresis ?

Yes, see the post at the top of this issue, and the video I posted.

Does it have form of time or only amplitude?

What do you mean?

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

I mean if the hysteresis is only function of amplitude and time-invariant. If the issue is caused by temperature, it will change with time. If it is caused by some form of positive feedback in the circuit, will depend only on the signal amplitude.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow I'm still not sure exactly what you mean. Can you give me an example of a measurement I would do to test that?

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

Do you have power detectors in your lab? Connect one to measure the input power and second to measure the output power. Connect the power detector outputs to the XY inputs of the scope and for certain frequency change the amplitude quickly up and down (<1s). you should see a single line response. If there is a hysteresis loop, it means that it is not thermal issue. Then change the amplitude toggle rate to a few second and repeat measurement. If you see a hysteresis loop that area depends on toggling rate, it means it is thermal issue.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Okay, I can do that tomorrow.

I've already done something a bit like that, but didn't understand what I saw. The behaviour is quite non-linear in both time and amplitude (which is why I don't think it's a thermal issue). Look here https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/21218399/39468229-ed208002-4d29-11e8-8de7-dcb3284b462f.jpg for the time non-linearity and here https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/21218399/39369489-5979e886-4a34-11e8-83a0-8aa87172623f.png for the amplitude non-linearity.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Okay Greg, what do you think about this...

Setup:

First video: toggling between -3dBm and -11dBm, spending 5seconds at each power level. This video clearly shows the hysteresis.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1meVpScOlZNWi30ljDPt4U0pbO_thE-5x

Second video: toggling between -3dBm and -10dBm. You can see the hysteresis is completely gone. For all powers above -10dBm, I do not see the hysteresis, so the amplitude non-linearity is very strong. This is part of the reason that I do not think the effect is thermal (unless some kind of thermal cutout is tripping).

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oHQ0SfTUdvxVp___AjpoR7FxARQsUgN6

Edit: oops, posted videos in the wrong order!

hartytp commented 6 years ago

One more test:

With the fast toggle, I do not see this effect. So, it seems to be non-linear in time as well.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ImkYQuroSSTrXPTUT-2SgR01QTBp9dXj

hartytp commented 6 years ago

I can't think of an explanation for this...

hartytp commented 6 years ago

If you can think of any other measurements you want me to do then let me know. Otherwise I'll stop there.

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

Thanks for measurements. This can be some DC bias effect and related time constant. Thermal effects would be much slower. Could be some stage oscillating at much higher frequency which was filtered out before you were able to notice. Can you connect a spectrum analyser to see if there is something appearing in GHz range? If there is nothing at the output, make a few turns antenna and sniff with it inside. This would explain the hysteresis and the effect you observe.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow Okay, I'll look at both the main output and at the test points on the spectrum analyzer with the input driven at 200MHz near P3dB. I'll let you know if I see anything.

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

@hartytp I'd look with two power levels. It's quite possible that with higher input power the oscillations stop...

hartytp commented 6 years ago

I did that, but I didn't see anything. I looked with no RF input, -11dBm RF input (well, a bit less than that due to my synth calibration errors) and -2dBm. For higher powers, I see a lot of harmonics but that's it.

I looked at the RF output and 4 test points (input, switch output, pre amp 1 output, pre amp 2 output). I did not see any large non-harmonic oscillations.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

All measurements are 100MHz to 13.2GHz span. 100kHz RBW.

No input power applied: 20180503_153549

Low input power (-11dBm on synth): 20180503_154147

High input power (-2dBm on synth): 20180503_154929

These shots are all of booster's output, but the signals I saw on the test points looked pretty similar.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Oops, those are in the wrong order. Anyway, I didn't see any oscillations obviously visible.

FWIW, the harmonics seem to be worst after the second pre-amp in the current design, so I guess that's what saturates first.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

From my previous measurement I'm pretty sure this only occurs in the pa stage as I didn't see hysteresis on the TPs.

So unless there is some thermal cutput in the FET I think this has to be an issue with the biasing of the final stage. Are you sure -1.2V is enough for 5W output power?

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

@hartytp I'm not sure. Maciej recommended such voltage. After the weekend I will try to recreate this issue in my setup.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow I checked the datasheet and Maciej's design looks correct AFAICT (although, I'd need to model it to make sure).

Hopefully you can recreate it and track it down!

Anyway, it's mysteries like this that make RF interesting.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow did you have any luck reproducing this issue?

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

Maciej got the amplifier back and will recreate it.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Great. Let me know how he gets on, and if he's able to recreate the issue. I'm very curious to hear what's going on.

On a related note, looking at the FET biasing diagram in the data sheet, I do still wonder if we will need to implement active feedback on the gate voltage to stabilise the bias current.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

How is this going? Did Maciej manage to reproduce the issue?

Note that I also saw a high voltage on the reverse power measurement with the amplifier driving a high-quality 50R load (https://github.com/sinara-hw/Booster/issues/2#issuecomment-385637632). It would be good to know what voltage you expect here.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

any progress on this? Would it help if I shipped you our amplifier unit back?

gkasprow commented 6 years ago

Maciej said that will send you today an email with his findings.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Summary of offline conversations with Maciej:

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow how is this going? Has a solution been found? Getting booster into production is absolutely my top priority atm, and these delays are causing me big problems.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Maciej fixed this by increasing a biasing inductor.