sinara-hw / Booster

Modular 8-channel RF power amplifier
Other
16 stars 3 forks source link

Booster v1.1 testing #56

Closed hartytp closed 6 years ago

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Booster v1.1 here and looking really nice. The mechanics feel vastly improved from the initial version.

One minor niggle is that it would be slightly nicer if the screws on the FP were CS rather than cap head. Otherwise, it looks great.

Also, the lid was a bit tricky to remove because it fits so snugly (had to stick a screwdriver through the fan holes to push it out). However, once I did get it off I was rewarded by seeing how beautiful it all looks inside. I'm really impressed.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

From a mechanical standpoint: I've done some quick disassembly (removed an amplifier module lid, removed an entire module) and I'm really struggling to find things I don't like about it. Very well done.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Actually, one other thing: the (M3?) internal CSK Phillips screws were a bit tricky to remove. Not sure if they were threadlocked or just done up very tightly, but some of the heads started to strip. Using cap head screws (and maybe even increasing the screw size a touch) would probably make life easier.

Edit: or, for the ones that have to be CSK, can we at least use allen key heads?

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Also, channel 0 was a little tricky to remount. I had to remove the lid to get the D-type to remate with the PCB.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Related to the previous comment, the amplifier mounting feels a little over-defined due to the use of CSK screws to hold the amplifier channels down. Might be better to use cap head screws with a generous clearance hole to give some slack.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@gkasprow @wizath here is the UART output when I enable it:

1 1

any ideas?

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Okay, the interlock on channel 1 was because I wasn't 50R terminating that input (none of the other channels seemed to mind).

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Still, the variance in bias current seems odd, since these have been calibrated.

wizath commented 6 years ago

Did you swap any module?

hartytp commented 6 years ago

I don't believe so! I wrote numbers on them before removing, so the worst case would presumably be if I had swapped 7 with 0, 6 with 1, etc. However, looking at the bias current measurements, I don't think that would explain what we see. Do you?

wizath commented 6 years ago

I've observed that calibration is channel specific - e.g if you calibrate module in slot 1 then insert it in slot 2 it won't be the same

hartytp commented 6 years ago

However, maybe we should make the UART report the unique ID of each channel, and store the channel ID along with the calibration data, to allow this kind of think to be checked.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Okay, let me try swapping them around and see what happens...

wizath commented 6 years ago

I'll add ID reporting

hartytp commented 6 years ago

hmm...in fact, I can't have swapped the channels around. I can tell by the stickers that TechnoSytem put on them (the stickers bridge the gap beween adjacent amplifier channels, so if you swap the channels around the stickers aren't in the right places any more). So, I'm pretty confident that they are all in the same places that I received them in..

hartytp commented 6 years ago

20180831_123640

See this photo. If I swap 7 with 0 then the stickers don't bridge the units correctly

PS these electro polished RF modules are so shiny I feel like I need to be in a clean room to touch them

wizath commented 6 years ago

Owwww, they could swapped them....

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Owwww, they could swapped them....

? how?

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Did you record the channel IDs when you calibrated them? that would allow us to check.

wizath commented 6 years ago

They took it from me to assembly them, and probably swapped them all. But its simple fix - I'll write you the details about current calibration since it's super easy

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Great, thanks! Can you post the details on the Wiki, please?

Do we also need to recalibrate the Tx/Rx power measurements?

wizath commented 6 years ago

No, I don't think power measurement recalibration is needed.

You can connect 50 Ohm terminator to input or leave it unconnected. Then you type stop in console to stop status messages from appearing (the're disabled by default in new version). Then you simply call calbias <ch number> <desired current> and wait if the process will catch the selected value.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

You can connect 50 Ohm terminator to input or leave it unconnected. Then you type stop in console to stop status messages from appearing (the're disabled by default in new version). Then you simply call calbias and wait if the process will catch the selected value.

Nice! is the bias current in A or mA? i.e. is the calibration process you did calbias 0 0.16?

I'm glad you implemented this nicely -- at some point I'd like to play with running these amplifiers at a lower bias current to reduce the power consumption at the expense of less gain and lower P1dB. This will make that process very easy

wizath commented 6 years ago

in mA's, calbias 0 160

hartytp commented 6 years ago

thanks

wizath commented 6 years ago

Anyway, I think that this option should be available to end-user since current calibration can't really be done properly in production.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Anyway, I think that this option should be available to end-user since current calibration can't really be done properly in production.

Why not?

hartytp commented 6 years ago

@wizath for channel 2, calibration seems to have failed. I see DAC 15 CURRENT 120 Have you seen that before?

Anyway, I think that this option should be available to end-user since current calibration can't really be done properly in production.

If the calibration alogrithm were improved a bit (large steps first, then smaller steps) so that it was a bit faster then the amplifier could just autocal on power up...

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Channel 7 calibration also fails: DAC 15 CURRENT 146

wizath commented 6 years ago

Yes, I will improve it, but for now there are other issues in line.

Channel 7 calibration also fails: DAC 15 CURRENT 146

That's unfortunate - we need to better set the voltage, by using the potentiometer on module, so there is more range to calibrate on (since calibration values on some modules are very close to the DAC limits).

wizath commented 6 years ago

You can adjust the current (displayed on status messages), by using potentiometer on RFPA_PA_OUT board, then recalibrate.

wizath commented 6 years ago

Anyway, I think that this option should be available to end-user since current calibration can't really be done properly in production.

Why not?

If we calibrate whole set (box + 8 modules) it's fine, but if user wants to replace one unit, it must be calibrated again after inserting it to the slot - because AFAICT current calibration is slot and module dependant.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

That's unfortunate - we need to better set the voltage, by using the potentiometer on module, so there is more range to calibrate on (since calibration values on some modules are very close to the DAC limits).

Okay, maybe we need to adjust these limits for the next revision.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

You can adjust the current, by using potentiometer on RFPA_PA_OUT board, then recalibrate.

Where is that? Do you have a photo?

wizath commented 6 years ago

img_20180831_154718 It's the POT1, in the middle

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Okay, I'll look at that. Any advice as to how I should tweak it (which direction, how much)?

hartytp commented 6 years ago

FWIW, in that channel, the coax was resting on the PA chip. I'll put some hot glue to hold it away.

wizath commented 6 years ago

Oh, I forgot - another command is bias <channel> <value 0-4095> which enable you to control bias voltage. You can set it to 0, then turn the potentiometer to lower the voltage (if there is not enough current). You can measure negative voltage on the pot's leg close to C2 silk. It should be around -0.8-1 V, then reapply calibration.

The current changes will be visible on status messages easily.

wizath commented 6 years ago

Next batch will be calibrated to the center of DAC range, so there will be more room to adjust the current.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Oh, I forgot - another command is bias <value 0-4095> which enable you to control bias voltage. You can set it to 0, then turn the potentiometer to lower the voltage (if there is not enough current). You can measure negative voltage on the pot's leg close to C2 silk. It should be around -0.8-1 V, then reapply calibration.

I don't have a wiring harness to give me access to the pot while I do that. I could make something but it would take time

wizath commented 6 years ago

Oh, I forgot about top board blocking the way. I'll tell you which way to turn to increase current in a second

wizath commented 6 years ago

Maciej suggested that top board should have hole for screwdriver to adjust the pot.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Maciej suggested that top board should have hole for screwdriver to adjust the pot.

:+1: and a note on the silk screen indicating which direction to turn for more juice

we should also consider changing the dividers to give a large range of bias currents without a pot. Or, even scrap the pot (do we need it when the DAC is 16-bit?)

wizath commented 6 years ago

img_20180831_165848

So you turn in direction of "+" to get more current, and opposite to get less current. Be gentle, and turn only several degrees. DAC is 12 bit

hartytp commented 6 years ago

DAC is 12 bit

Would it be easier to use a higher-resolution DAC in the next revision and scrap the pot? One fewer thing that has to be adjusted by hand.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Thanks. That works

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Any idea why channel 2 interlock trips if the input isn't 50R terminated? No other channels do that.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

1 1

wizath commented 6 years ago

Any idea why channel 2 interlock trips if the input isn't 50R terminated? No other channels do that.

That may be some issue with power detector. I've got module with simmilar issue - waiting for Maciej to come back from Germany and resolve this.

hartytp commented 6 years ago

Okay, thanks.

One more thing. Look at this:

fan

why is channel 7 so hot?

hartytp commented 6 years ago

hmm...unless it's the hot glue I put in to hold the cable down keeping the sensor warm