Closed nkrackow closed 5 months ago
IMHO his is a step into the wrong direction. Evaluate whether you'd be much better off (especially in the long and mid term) with any of the alternative solutions in the shared design space: a dedicated combined cpu+peripheral board, one of the existing cpu/soc "carrier" boards plus a peripheral mezzanine, or a diot controller module plus peripheral module. Please do consider supporting the move to diot!
It's not possible to add EEM connectors on this board. But we have a DIOT EEM Adapter which enables us to support EEMs until all of them are moved to DIOT form factor.
Since most Sinara devices out there right now do not have DIOT, a stand alone STM32/ECP5-based controller that also supports EEM would be a lot nicer for the transition period. Humpback is very limited in EEM count and FPGA size and needs the bulky Nucleo board.
I know this is a big ask layout-wise, but would it be possible to somehow squeeze in the EEMs or potentially just do an EEM variant?