Open ShravanSunder opened 1 year ago
Yes, makes sense to have such a type. It should be named UndefinableDeep
though.
It should follow the same style as our existing deep types: https://github.com/sindresorhus/type-fest/blob/main/source/readonly-deep.d.ts
See https://github.com/ts-essentials/ts-essentials/tree/master/lib/deep-undefinable
is it ok to put a PR to add something like this?
Upvote & Fund